Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/284914410/
Filed under: Desktops, Laptops
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/00e84/00e84addc08be5092cdbe2eacf40f0d34a328e09" alt=""
Intel has been boasting of
DirectX 10 support for its various integrated graphics options for
some time now, but it's only just recently gotten around to actually releasing a Vista driver that brings its GM965 and G35 Express chipsets up to speed. Of course, NVIDIA just couldn't help itself from getting a few (
more) digs in at Intel's expense, and it's now kindly provided a few benchmarks to show just how badly Intel's integrated DirectX 10 solution stacks up against the bleeding-edge DirectX 10-ready games it now ostensibly supports. They couldn't find a single game that was able to crank out more than 5 fps, even at a lowly 1280 x 1024 resolution and with the usual graphics intensive settings turned off. Then again, 4.4 fps in Crysis is pretty much par for the course.
Read - Crave, "Intel updates graphics with multimedia capabilities"
Read - Hardware Secrets, "Are Intel chipsets really capable of running DirectX 10 games?"
Permalink |
Ema! il this< /a> | Comments data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f4573/f4573ff385693845231540606e594bc5f330d9e8" alt=""