Hands-on with Sprint's Touch Pro
Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/389250956/
Filed under: Cellphones, Handhelds
Thursday, September 11, 2008
Sony demos battery-powered, fully-wireless OLED TV
Source: http://feeds.engadget.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/389296459/
Filed under: Displays, Wireless
Wednesday, September 10, 2008
iPod Nano Review [Apple]
Source: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/388094203/ipod-nano-review
Apple's decision to transition from the fat third-generation iPod nano to the new svelte fourth-generation iPod nano must have been an easy one. The latest version has the same size screen, the same 8 and 16GB storage and the same video support as before, but adds a much more comfortable (sorta) oval shape, a curved screen, an accelerometer and most importantly, a much improved user interface that aims to solve some of the limitations the Clickwheel has compared to the iPod Touch and iPhone UIs. This evolution succeeds beautifully, even if it's relatively minor.
The hardware:
The very first thing you'll notice is how much better the curved aluminum body feels in your hand, even compared to the very similarly shaped 2G nano. The brushed metal feels great, looks great, and is much less scratch-prone than the shiny silver backing in the 3G fat. It's also thinner, because it tapers off to the sides, but it's as thick at its thickest point as the entire body of the previous generation. There's slightly more glare from the screen because it's curved to be flush with the surface, but that's nothing you can't live with. Aesthetically, it's a lot nicer looking than the previous flat screens.
Pocket-ability is definitely important in nanos, and it's less conspicuous in your pocket than the 3G fat version. Unless you have really tight pants and have your pockets up to your stomach, you will most likely not even notice the difference between the two. But if you do do this, watch out. The sharp edges on the top and bottom—a result of constructing the body with one piece of metal and having caps at the ends—are likely to draw blood when scratched directly up against the flesh. So ! let that be a warning to you, shirtless guy who has his really tight pants hiked up way too high. I didn't think it was a big deal, but Lam carved the word iPod into his table with the edge to prove a point, that it WAS really sharp.
An added accelerometer also brings some iTouch/iPhone functionality to their little brother, which is well integrated where it makes sense. Rotating to landscape mode is as fast as it is on the iTouch/iPhone, and the subsequent Cover Flow view is baby butt smooth. Games, which were on the nano before, can also access motion-sensing. The built-in marble maze game is as good as the ones we've seen in the App Store. The "shake to shuffle" feature picks a random song when you jiggle the nano, but is smart enough to not skip tracks if the screen is off or if the hold switch is on. You can of course disable the thing entirely if you're listening to music on a bulldozer.
The software:
The portrait UI is also a great improvement over the the fat nano landscape UI, and makes much better use of the available real estate. (The older nano rather awkwardly tried to fit two columns on the screen. This only has one.) The new menu and display fills up the entire top half of device, which gives you more list items at once. Scrolling through menus and Cover Flow is as fast as we've seen on any iPod.
On-the-fly genius playlist creation, which recommends music already on your device based a starting point of any song in your library, worked well. When generating one from MGMT's Electric Feel, genius recommended The Shins, Arcade Fire, Radiohead, Beck and Damien Rice. Not exactly the same genre or song type, but someone who listens to MGMT would be likely to enjoy all these other artists. And that's the point. Apple's basing their recommendations not off of analyzing the individual tempo or features of a track, but off of purchasing history and many customers' music libraries. It's too early to say whether this method is better or ! worse th an Pandora's, which we love.
The new nano also comes with a Voice Memo app that works just like the Belkin devices currently on the market. It's too bad that you have to pay $29.99 for a pair of headphones that actually have a mic on board; the default ones are just standard earbuds. Voice notes to yourself, with the microphone just hanging from your ear, is plenty loud enough to understand exactly what you say. Recording conversations with someone across the table isn't as good, but if you pump up the volume you can make most of it out. Clicking the center button also inserts "chapters" into your recording.
This generation comes in nine colors, which include pink, purple, black and silver, but no white. It's also the first nano to use solely USB charging, so old Firewire chargers are rendered useless. If you're into Apple and looking for a midrange media player, you should have no hesitations in picking one up. Otherwise, your current player will do just fine. [Apple iPod nano]
iPod Touch Version 2 Review [Ipod Touch Review]
Source: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/gizmodo/full/~3/388132184/ipod-touch-version-2-review
The second iteration of the iPod touch equals or improves upon its predecessor in almost every physical facet. Slimmer, lighter and more functional, the v.2 also gets new volume control buttons, full Nike+ integration and a built-in loudspeaker. It's not a radical change, but it's better.
First, the volume switch on the side is a fantastic addition. Having used the original iPod touch almost every day for the past year, I immediately loved how easy it was to turn the volume up or down without having to think about it. The other reason why this feature matters — apps. Some apps, like Aurora Feint didn't add a soft volume slider on screen, so when headphones are plugged in on the iPod touch, it's unbearably loud and can't be adjusted.
The second key feature is the built-in speaker. Sometimes, you wanna show a friend a video or new song without forcing them to use your dirty earbuds. This speaker remedies the problem. It's not terribly loud, and will never replace your headphones, but its good for the aforementioned scenarios. But it also means we're all likely to end upnext to some asshole on the train who refuses to use his headphones.
The new general shape of the iPod touch v.2 is nice, with the bezel and back all being one piece—looking like its borne from the same DNA as the iPhone 3G—but I could live without the shiny chrome. It gets smudgy and scratched up and gross looking. You could get a case for it, but that effectively negates its anorexic shape, not to mention its aesthetic value. This is a minor complaint, but compared to the orignal iPod touch, the home button feels kind of cheap. It's less springy, more plasticky, and noisier (on a relative scale). Obviously, that doesn't make or break the device. But its something you use enough to notice.
It should also be noted that the scree! n on the new iPod touch looks the same as the iPhone 3G — which is to say it has an intentional yellow tint. While some may not like that, I prefer it to the blue hued screen on the original.
The final thing to discuss is iPod Software 2.1.1. Available for both the original iPod touch and the new one, 2.1.1 introduces the Genius automatic playlist generator to the device, as well as complete Nike+ integration (to be reviewed on another day). Genius playlists are easy to use and work reasonably well, creating a list of similar songs and artists based on your selection. You can create a Genius list one of two ways — in the playlist menu, you can browse through your songs in a list. Or you can hit the Genius icon under the play button on the Now Playing screen. Once you do that, a new list comes up with the "Genius" picks. The Genius list is automatically stored with your other playlists until you create a new one.
All in all, iPod touch Version 2 doesn't do anything worse than the previous iPod, and it does a few things better. Current iPod touch owners probably won't find enough new here to make the switch (truth be told, this is more like iPod touch v1.5). But those previously on the fence about whether or not to buy have even more reasons to consider it now.
32GB laptop SSD for less than $100: caveat emptor
Source: http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/weblogsinc/engadget/~3/387757277/
Filed under: Storage
[Via DailyTech]
Read -- NewEgg
Read -- MwavePermalink | Email this | Comments
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
