Monday, September 29, 2008

Browser Speed Tests: The Compiled, Up-to-Date Results [Performance Tests]

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/404025740/browser-speed-tests-the-compiled-up+to+date-results

Back when Firefox 3's final release candidate dropped, we ran some tests to compare its page-loading, memory use, and technical timing to Internet Explorer 7, Opera, and Safari for Windows. Then Google Chrome arrived, so we pitted it against the betas for Firefox 3.1 and Internet Explorer 8, and shared the results. The tests were by and large the same, but many commenters wisely asked to see all the results, betas or no betas. Well, today we've patched together all our data, thrown in a fresh test of the Opera 9.6 beta, and we're sharing all the graphy goodness. Read on to see a full comparison of the major browsers you can load on Windows.

The tests

You can read up on our testing methods in their entirety at the original testing feature. I've come to realize, however, that between all three rounds of testing involved, the "8-page load" test may be the most vulnerable to variables—some of the pages included are quite dynamic, so if, say, Gizmodo puts up a large number of videos or huge pictures, it could affect the total loading time. Other than that, though, the page-loading tests are run by a human watching a timer, the JavaScript from Sean Patrick Kane's web test, the CSS from a downloadable form, and memory use from checking Windows Vista's Task Manager.

Test 1: Page Loading—Winner: Opera (9.5)!

No surprise that Opera 9.6's beta performed just as well as the official release, on start-ups both both cold (right after b! oot-up) and warm (having launched at least once). I'm heartened to see comparable results between the first batch of browsers I tested and their newer betas.

The next speed test, loading eight pages from a bookmark folder, left me scratching my head. Why did the newer betas take so much longer to load a similar set of pages? As stated above, my best guess is the dynamic nature of at least one page in the group, but Opera was tested separately from the other betas, and didn't gain much in speed.

Test 2: JavaScript & CSS—Winner: Safari! (by a nose)

It's hard to beat Safari's performance in both Cascading Style Sheets and the JavaScript code that fronts so many webapps. It has to be noted, however, that most browsers, other than Internet Explorer, don't out-run one another by a huge stretch in JavaScript; Chrome and Safari, though, pull ahead on CSS.

Test 3: Memory Use—Winner: Firefox!

It's reassuring that Mozilla puts so much effort into memory usage in Firefox 3 releases—seeing as how most readers of this site are more than open to extension suggestions.

So that's all the testing data we have on the latest web browse! rs here at Lifehacker Labs. Got another set of test results you put faith in? Surprised at any of our outcomes? Tell us about it in the comments.


Read More...

cli.gs Brings Short URLs with Detailed Analytics [TinyURL]

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/404907413/cligs-brings-short-urls-with-detailed-analytics

Webapp cli.gs transforms your long URLs into short URLs with detailed click-through statistics. Unlike previously mentioned dwarfURL, cli.gs gives analytics junkies a rush with interactive AJAX graphs and detailed referrer data in addition to search engine references to the particular URL (or "clig"). cli.gs doesn't stop there: any time someone mentions your clig in social media, be it a blogger, on Twitter, or via delicious, the source is also calculated and treated as coming from "social media." Call it TinyURL on steroids. Clig are also supported by LongURL so you can get the details of the destination URL before you actually click.


Read More...

Five Best Sites to Stream TV [Hive Five]

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/405513110/five-best-sites-to-stream-tv


With or without the cooperation of television networks, your favorite TV shows have moved to the internet in a big way. On Tuesday we asked you to share the best sites to stream TV, and now we're back with the five most popular answers. Keep reading for a breakdown of the best places on the web to find and watch the shows you love on-demand from the convenience of your browser.

Hulu

Hulu streams high-resolution, ad-supported videos of both television shows and movies. More specifically, the site distributes content by NBC-Universal, Fox, and a handful of their subsidiaries. Popular shows hosted by Hulu include The Daily Show, The Colbert Report, Battlestar Galactica, The Simpsons, The Office, and Saturday Night Live. The biggest complaint leveled against Hulu is its US-only restrictions, though many of you are using previously mentioned Hotspot Shield to access Hulu from outside the US. Hulu isn't entirely US-only, though—the first show Hulu made available to the world at large was Dr. Horrible's Sing-Along Blog, with Lifehacker favorite Felicia Day.

SurfTheChannel

SurfTh eChannel aggregates video from all over the internet—including sites like YouTube, MetaCafe, and Hulu (along with much more obscure sites)—then makes all of those videos available through a simple, searchable interface. It's not always pretty, but the selection is huge. The downside: According to the STC homepage, the site will shut down on October 1st.

SideReel

SideReel is a video aggregation site similar to SurfTheChannel, providing links to streaming video from all over the internet. It's an attractive site, but if you're there to find video it can be difficult to navigate to begin with. If video is what you're looking for, just navigate to the Links section of a show's page and click on the episode you want.

Straight from the Source

Apart from the sites dedicated to streaming content, more and more networks are building their own on-site tools for streaming content from the source. For example, the big three networks all have streaming sites: the ABC Full Episode Player, the NBC Video Library, and CBS Video. If you missed a show you're dying to catch online, be sure to check the web site of the network it aired on to see if it's available.

BBC iPlayer

The BBC iPlayer streams content from up to 250 programs from the British Broadcast! ing Corp oration. BBC iPlayer restricts streaming to the UK-only, but like Hulu, setting up a proxy with an application like previously mentioned Hotspot Shield has worked for many people looking to get around these restrictions.


You've seen the best options, so now it's time to vote for your favorite.
Which is the Best Site to Stream TV?
( surveys)
The internet is an excellent new frontier for keeping up with the TV shows you love, but it's certainly not the only way new technology is making it easier to watch TV. For more, check out six ways to catch your favorite TV shows. Whether or not your favorite site made the list, let's hear more about it in the comments.

Read More...

Persuade People with Subconscious Techniques [People Hacks]

Source: http://feeds.gawker.com/~r/lifehacker/full/~3/405775263/persuade-people-with-subconscious-techniques

The power of persuasion can get you far in this world, even if you're not in sales, and a few simple communication techniques can go a long way to get someone to agree with you. Tutorial site wikiHow runs down "subconscious" actions for persuading others, like framing, mirroring, timing, or even touching the person on the arm or shoulder. This list is similar to our previously posted (and controversial!) top 10 conversation hacks. How do you convince someone to come on over to your side in conversation? Let us know in the comments. Photo by jurvetson.


Read More...

Yahoo! Makes Backdoor Entry In Google Search Results via their Glue Pages

Source: http://www.labnol.org/internet/yahoo-glue-backdoor-entry-into-google-search/4653/

Yahoo Glue is an interesting tool for searching information on the web – type in a query and you get results from sources like Wikipedia, Flickr, YouTube, blogs, news, etc. on a single page.

yahoo glue pages

When you perform a search on Yahoo! Glue, the results page has a very clean URL structure something on the lines of Wikipedia. For instance, a search for ‘delhi’ would show the following page:

http://in.glue.yahoo.com/page/delhi

You can substitute ‘delhi’ in the above URL with another term (say madonna) to see the corresponding Glue page.

http://in.glue.yahoo.com/page/madonna

The surprising part is that these ‘yahoo! glue pages’, which clearly fall in the category of auto-generated content, now rank in Google search pages. In fact, there are at least 143,000 ‘glues’ that are indexed by Google – that’s more than knol.

google-glue

So how did Google discover all these ‘glues’? After some digging, I came across this page that is probably a directory of search queries and may been constructed for other search engines to find and crawl all these ‘virtual’ pages hosted on Yahoo! Glue.

Related: How to Enhance Yahoo! Search Results

Yahoo! Makes Backdoor Entry In Google Search Results via their Glue Pages - Digital Inspiration

Read More...